How to Fix the CFP's G5 Exclusion: A Path Forward for Inclusion

The G5's Ambiguous Role in the CFP Landscape

The College Football Playoff (CFP) has been a transformative development in the world of collegiate sports, but not everyone who bleeds school colors gets to be part of the action. The Group of Five (G5) conferences, comprising schools from the American Athletic Conference, Conference USA, Mid-American Conference, Mountain West, and Sun Belt, have notoriously found themselves on the outside looking in when it comes to securing a playoff berth.

In 'How to FIX the G5's inclusion in the CFP', the discussion dives into the disparities faced by Group of Five teams in college football, exploring key insights that sparked deeper analysis on our end.

Historical Context: The G5 Struggle

Since the inception of the CFP, major conferences like the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, PAC-12, and ACC have dominated the playoff scene. The inherent bias towards larger conferences has been widely criticized, sidelining G5 teams despite their impressive records and performances. Notably, schools like UCF and Coastal Carolina have made strong cases for inclusion, only to be met with lukewarm responses from selection committees.

Why This Matters More Than Ever

In a landscape where college football heavily influences school branding and associated revenue, the stakes are high for G5 programs. They are not just vying for glory on the field; they are competing for resources, student recruitment, and national recognition. Missing out on CFP opportunities can have far-reaching impacts on funding, sponsorship deals, and overall program viability, further entrenching disparities in the sport.

The G5's Road to Recognition

So, what steps can the G5 take to fortify its bid for a CFP slot? One possible pathway is heightened inter-conference scheduling. By scheduling games against top-tier Power Five teams and securing victories, G5 programs can bolster their profiles within the playoff conversation. Additionally, adopting a more collaborative approach to fairness in rankings could shift the current bias, promoting mutual respect across all conferences.

Engaging the Fans: The Case for Change

Fans play an essential role in demanding change, and their voices can influence the decisions of conferences and schools. Mobilizing support through social media campaigns hashtagging #InclusionMatters or #G5Pride can create momentum for reform. With the growing visibility of college football through platforms like the CFP merchandise and televised events, fans have the power to redefine inclusivity within college sports.

Future Predictions: Where Do We Go From Here?

As college football evolves, the CFP may eventually accommodate a more expansive format that allows for greater representation of G5 teams. With the NCAA deliberating over potential expansion to 12 teams, this presents a unique opportunity for a more inclusive landscape that champions equality across conferences. The question remains whether stakeholders will have the vision to construct an equitable model.

Final Thoughts: It's Time to Level the Playing Field

The dynamics of college football are shifting, thanks to the relentless pursuit by G5 teams for their rightful place in the CFP narrative. An equitable solution is necessary, one that recognizes not just the power of tradition but the rising talent and potential of G5 programs. As passionate fans, it is our responsibility to advocate for change. To manifest fairness in the game we love, let’s push forward and make some noise!